Politics versus Justice in the US: Iran Sanctions Case

Everyone is aware that despite Halkbank being a completely different case, the super-powerful US could have fined the bank – there was no need for Zarrab to be a witness or for Atilla to be a defendant. However, the US did not take this course of action, as it had done with other banks.

Gulenists’ role in Zarrab, Atilla cases

“Evidence” cited in the Iran Sanctions, or Hakan Atilla case, formerly known as the Reza Zarrab case, have been provided by the Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO), who illegally smuggled documents from Turkey to the US.

What is really behind the Iran Sanctions Case?

It all began in April 2013 with a letter written by an effective group of members in the US House of Representatives to former US Secretary of State John Kerry and the US Secretary of Treasury Jack Lew. The letter, which mostly bared the signatures of the opposing republicans, stated that Turkey had violated sanctions the US had imposed on Iran.

Reza Zarrab to stand as witness in US case

Victor Rocco asked the jury, “What would you do if US prosecutors made voice recordings and gave them to another country without the permission of the government, and then they were used as evidence?”

US judges the violation of self-imposed sanctions

The prosecutors in Turkey accused the former attorney for the southern district of New York Preet Bharara and the district’s current acting attorney, Joon H. Kim, of using illegally obtained information and documents from previous investigations in Turkey for an ongoing case in the US.