The world witnessed a major humanitarian crisis last week, as regime forces and its allies committed atrocities in Aleppo, along with the inaction of the U.S. and EU and the rhetorical actions of the U.N. Security Council.
While we discuss how to deal with the foreign fighter phenomenon in Syria and Iraq, under the very nose of the international coalition, the Assad regime built a multinational crime network. The tragedies and problems that this network generated started being discussed without even mentioning the regime. When the refugee crisis erupted, the international community failed to realize that this crisis occurred as a result of crimes against humanity committed by the Assad regime. They were not running to something but running away from something.
When Daesh terrorism emerged and spread to Iraq, the international coalition failed to understand that it was a consequence of the situation that Assad and his partners had generated. There was almost constant and intentional denial of the presence of a problem called the Assad regime. While he showed the international community what he was capable of in terms of producing, spreading and exporting violence and insecurity, the international community demonstrated that it was incapable of collective, firm and resolute action toward violators of international norms, rules and laws. Attractive phrases, such as responsibility to protect, “never again” and conventions, turned out to be empty rhetoric. It was a collective failure of the international system and international organizations. One of the most important contributors to the survival of this regime was the failure of these parties.
Of course, the failure of international organizations was insufficient for the regime because even under this scandalous failure the regime may not survive by acting against the majority of its population. At this critical juncture, its partners entered the game. The contribution of the Iranian government via the Quds force to train, arm and fight for the regime was unprecedented. Later, Hezbollah contributed. In addition, foreign fighters allowed the regime to escalate its violence. Finally, when even those endorsements and assistance were not sufficient, Russia entered the game to help the Syrian regime.In short, the most well-documented and recorded history of five years of atrocities will provide the perspective required to understand the tragedy. The world witnessed a major humanitarian crisis last week, as regime forces and its allies committed atrocities in Aleppo, along with the inaction of the U.S. and the EU and rhetorical actions of the U.N. Security Council. For months, the Turkish government warned the international community about a potential crisis in Aleppo and that plans should be ready for the worst-case scenario. However, the world was neither prepared nor willing to take any precautions about future calamities. For the anti-Syria refugee sections of society in the West and those who resisted the idea of a “safe zone,” this might be a learning experience to understand why these people are running away from their homes and why they are seeking shelter and refuge in other countries. What happened in Aleppo will not stay in Aleppo and will not be forgotten easily. The trauma that the incidents and massacres generated will continue to haunt generations in the Middle East. The super powers will be remembered for their positions and actions during the Aleppo crisis. Maybe after several decades, some leaders will visit Aleppo and kneel in front of a memorial for the victims. But it will not easily clean the stain that emerged in the hearts and minds of the people. The pain, agony and trauma of Srebrenica and Rwanda demonstrate that people do not forget.